Category Archives: 3- SOLVING WORLD PROBLEMS

WILL WORLD WAR- 3 BE DIGITAL?

Imagine all of a sudden one day, across the entire country, everyone’s  bank account is emptied, business and government computers become inaccessible, power grids shut down, no internet or communications, our defense weapons and power plants become inoperative, cars stop dead in the street, and planes and trains become unsafe to use. How hard would it then be for another country to just walk in and take over or even remain anonymous demanding hundreds of billions in ransom to restore?   With world tension on the rise and nuclear weapons not an option without counter strikes that would destroy the planet, will the next major confrontation be digital?

The news is more frequently reporting business and government hacks where computers are encrypted and data held hostage until the company forks over a ransom.  The relativity small amounts of ransoms indicate they are most likely done by lone basement hackers. Now imagine a foreign country with thousands of highly trained computer experts spending  years secretly hacking into another country’s computers, preparing for a sudden digital Pearl Harbour type attack. 

At first it may sound far fetched but consider the following. Keystroke recording spyware can already secretly record every key pushed on your computer including user name and passwords to your accounts.  Spyware able to secretly track and turn on cell phone microphones and cameras has also exists not to mention Google Home and Alexia that if hacked can allow someone to listen to conversations undetected.  The list of possibilities goes as far as our imaginations.  Hacking of companies like OnStar would allow someone to activate the antitheft software on all their vehicles and shut them down.  It could take years to fix the damage.  Boeing’s Max 8 aircraft have been grounded for months with software problems and they weren’t even attacked with a virus.

Countries like Canada being digitally attacked by another country may at first sound ridicules but consider this, we buy items from countries that are made, assembled, shipped from the other side of the world and sold for a profit here at $1.25.  These third-world conditions combined with increasing populations and ever-dwindling resources and food are slowly turning these countries into hungry sharks.  Canada with its abundance of natural resources, fertile land and wealth combined with complacency when it comes to peace and trust make it the perfect unsuspecting seal. 

Now is the time to improve and tighten up our cybersecurity as well as backing up the countries critical systems with computers on offline sterile closed loops.

Dave Lister

listerlogic.com

 

THE SOLUTION TO SAVING THE ENVIRONMENT

The biggest threat to the environment is rarely talked about and easy to fix but unless it’s addressed soon, nothing else we do will keep us from destroying the planet.

The damage we do to the Earth is simple math. The size of the average persons carbon foot print, times the number of people on the planet. Since 1970 the worlds population has doubled. At the present rate kindergarten students today will see it double again in their lifetime, doubling the damage we’re currently doing to the planet. If left unchecked a generation later will see the Earths population double again making are carbon foot print 4 times what it is today, and so on. Just look around and you can see how fast cities and towns are expanding.

As we sit on the tipping point of catastrophic disaster even if the population stopped increasing today we would be lucky not to loose this game of Jenga we are playing with the worlds ecosystem. Left unchecked we will soon realize all the science, carbon taxes and government policies in the word won’t put a dent in fixing the damage done by this rapid population growth.

Even skeptics of climate change can’t ignore the logistics of providing enough food and energy for a world population multiple times larger then todays not to mention dealing with the waste. The more the worlds populations grow the greater the threat of conflict between nations over resources.

Having children is one of the most fulfilling and important parts of being human and no one has to give that up to save the planet. If every couple had an average of 2 children the worlds population would stop growing and become neutral, that combined with current programs and scientific advances might give us a chance at survival.

There is no time to waste. “World population” needs to be at the top of the list for combating climate change. The people of the world need to understand that controlling population growth is the only thing that will save us. Only then will governments be able to to make it work by phasing in policies like eliminating child tax breaks for large families. Changing current values will not be easy and it will take brave politicians with our support to implement the policy’s necessary.

A slowing growth in population will also effect many other issues. Although it would solve some problems like easing the housing crisis and transit problems it will also most likely have a negative effect on the stock market and countries with deficit based pyramid type economy’s.

We can no longer foolishly believe electric cars, carbon taxes, recycling, bicycling, and renewable energy will save the planet. Until population growth is brought under control, nothing else we do matters. Effects of biblical proportion from are actions are no longer generations in the future but will be felt within your or your children’s lifetime. After reading this, It is now up to you to do your part to help save the planet by getting the word out about population growth, through friends, school, work, social media, political lobbing or simply passing on this post. People are already beginning to focus on the science behind climate change but it is much more important to focus on the math.

Dave Lister

listerlogic.com

POLITICALLY CORRECT INJUSTICE

 

In the Canadian National News today, yet another high profile man is accused of sexual misconduct.  Despite no charges being laid by police, meager checking of facts, and an anonymous accuser, he is immediately fired from his job, and publicly disgraced.  Decades of hard work building a remarkable life,  gone in an instant.

In our hast to correct some long standing politically incorrect (or “PC”) social injustices, innocent until proven guilty in a court of law has been replaced with trial by media.   If that’s not bad enough, competition for viewers is driving even the most conservative media outlets to alter context and omit facts to sensationalize a story.  The result is a toxic culture that takes away the basic rights of the innocent.

Sexual misconduct and the “me too” movement have become the latest PC topics, it along with racism and discrimination often disproportionally dominate the news.   On Jan 12 in Toronto, despite a student being murdered on his way home from school it was a racism story about a girl claiming to have her religious clothing cut by an unknown attacker that headlined the national news.  All levels of government including the Prime Minister were quick to comment on it, condemning the attack and the person that did it,  vowing to use all resources available to quickly apprehend the perpetrator.  A few days later, after proper investigation by police it was found to be a hoax and never happened.  Luckily in this case an innocent suspect did not have their life ruined.

Other ways we try to correct injustices are also questionable but not so obvious.  In 2015, Our Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau was elected on a platform of being politically correct and fairness for all Canadians. In an effort to make government more fair and appear less sexist he set out to appoint his cabinet of being equal in gender, 15 men and 15 women.   Instead of appointing who is most qualified regardless of gender, he chose to correct a sexism problem with sexism. Hiring someone for the sole reason they are a women is no different then not hiring someone for the sole reason they are a women.

When it comes to some PC injustices “We will not tolerate it” is an expression frequently heard.  It is this intolerance that is taking away our basic right of freedom of speech through fear.  In a recent Facebook post, following a list of legitimate political concerns was written “Have the guts to repost this?”.  Their are some that will call this article sexist or racist for merely criticizing the unfair methods we handle these PC injustices.

Aside from promoting hatred, it’s important for everyone to feel free to express their opinions.  Changing sexist and racist views can only be done with dialogue, not condemnation.  The only thing worse then “sexist and racist views” is suppressed “sexist and racist views”.  I can’t help wonder if, and how much, suppressed views of how politically correct  problems were dealt with in the US contributed to the election of Donald Trump.

Let me make it clear, sexual misconduct, racism and discrimination are not only big problems in society today but in many cases a crime. They should be treated like all crimes and reported to police.    After a proper investigation if enough evidence exists, charges should be laid.  Injustices that are not against the law should be dealt with through litigation in the courts and be reflected  in future laws.  Its important to realize that changing peoples opinions can not be forced overnight, especially when unfair means are used.

As we struggle to find new ways to correct the unacceptable injustices that remain between us and a fair society for all, we need to make sure that by taking a step forward we are not taking 2 steps back.

Dave Lister

listerlogic.com

IS RACISM THE PROBLEM? STEREOTYPING AND WHY THE DIFFERENCE MATTERS.

These days, racism is considered one of the biggest problems in the world.   Ignorance they say is the cause, but maybe the greater ignorance is our refusal to study and better understand what has become a very delicate issue.  I have a hard time believing there are still that many people in Canada that think one race is superior to another.  Is stereotyping being confused with racism?  What if stereotyping was the cause of the majority of acts we considered racist?  What if there was a way to change it?

First we need to understand the difference between the two.  Racism is defined as the idea that one race is superior to another.  Stereotyping is a preconceived notion about a group of people based on an individual’s experience with that group.

What if racism is learned and reinforced through culture and upbringing?  No question, racism was a huge problem in Canada during black segregation back in the 1940’s.  Also a strong example that shows how the power of the cultural environment we grow up in can blind us in the way we think.   On the other hand, what if stereotyping is not learned through culture but rather a natural learning function of the human brain?  I’m not saying racism is still not a problem, but how much of what we consider racist today is actually stereotyping?

Imagine you are walking down a dark secluded street alone.  You hear someone coming up behind you fast.  You turn around to see who it is.  If given a choice, of the two men below, who would you rather it be?

If you said it doesn’t matter, and you are being honest with yourself, congratulations, you are not guilty of stereotyping.  For the rest of us that probably picked the guy on the right, ask yourself, why?  In most cases it comes down to the way they are dressed.  Our brain stereotypes the type of people they are by using limited personal knowledge and experience of the kind of people that dress that way.  But the fact is, the guy on the left could turn out to be the friendliest person you have ever met and the guy on the right could be carrying a gun and out to rob you.  Even if we’re aware that we are stereotyping, most people can’t help feeling more frightened by the guy on the left.  Evidence that shows how stereotyping can reach deep into our subconscious.

Stereotyping doesn’t just apply to how we dress it also can be on what kind of car we drive, our mannerisms, how we talk, where we live, our jobs, practically everything.  There are even forms of accepted stereotyping such as car insurance where premiums are partially based on stereotyping by age, gender, and where we live.

If the human brain stereotypes in so many different areas, is it not logical that it does so with culture?  Most people won’t admit they may still stereotype cultures in fear of being called raciest.  However, try searching “comedians stereotyping” on You Tube.  Comedians, usually of stereotyped minority groups, can still make jokes that would be considered racist and not tolerated coming from anyone else.  Did you laugh?  Does laughing mean you identify with it?

Every country has its own unique culture.  Does our brain actually stereotype against race, or the culture it associates with that race?

If two families from different races and cultures adopted babies from the others race and culture, what stereotypical cultural values would each of them have when they grew up?

Once learned over time, cultural values can take years, even generations to change. Here in Canada, this coupled with a high amount of immigration, helps to bolster cultural stereotyping.  Its not just cultures of foreign countries that are stereotyped,  micro cultures within Canada also exist based solely on demographics.   Whether you were brought up in the country, city, or a specific province, everyone is stereotyped.  The most extreme micro culture is in the bad areas of cities, often with high crime, gangs, drugs and violence.  It is these areas that seem to be the biggest problem with stereotyping culture being confused with race.

So how do we fix it and provide a better equality for all?

Stereotyping itself is bad enough but the greatest injustice happens when someone has prolonged exposure to only a small negative part of a culture and their brain stereotypes it to the entire culture.

For the last 2 years it seems every second night on the news they broadcasted a Muslim terror attack somewhere in the world.  For people that have little or no other contact with Muslim culture it has built up a deep rooted negative stereotype.  Suppose on the news, for the past two years instead of a terrorist attack, they only had stories of the many positive things in the Muslim culture.  Would Muslims have a positive stereotype?  I’m not saying to change the news but to understand the effect it has on people.  What would happen if when the news broadcasted a terrorist attack, they also made a point to also include a positive story on Muslim culture somewhere in the same broadcast?  Would that subconsciously reduce a build up of negative stereotyping?

Law enforcement and stereotyping is also a big problem both within Canada as well as other Countries.  When officers constantly work the same bad micro cultural areas that are predominantly one race,  it’s understandable how a stereotype of that culture can be mistaken with race.  What would happen if they alternated, working one week in a bad micro culture area and the next week in a better micro cultural area containing people of the same race?

Understanding and more research on how the brain stereotypes is key.  The more we understand on how the human brain stereotypes the better the solutions we will come up with to create a more equal and fair society for all.  If stereotyping is shown to be a natural process of the human brain that extends into our subconcious, treating it like racism and calling it ignorance, condemning it and assuming it will go away isn’t the solution.

Dave Lister

listerlogic.com

IS OUR STANDARD OF LIVING ON THE BACKS OF THE LESS FORTUNATE?

1986.057

I had just unpacked after returning from a trip to a third world Country.  As the TV  played in the background I tried to comprehend what I had just experienced.  The poor living conditions, lack of food, opportunity, and health care, makeshift houses with dirt floors, it all seemed unfair just because they were born in a different place then me.  Somehow my focus shifted to the TV show being broadcast, it was a doggie fashion show from LA.  Dogs of the wealthy were in a competition, being walked down the runway dressed in designer outfits worth thousands of dollars and collars imbedded with precious stones and diamonds.  What I experienced at that moment was much harder to comprehend.

In Canada the cost alone of mailing a letter within our Country with Canada Post is $1.00.  For the same amount of money we can buy an item at a dollar store consisting of:

  • the cost of  dozens of individually manufactured parts
  • plus the cost of shipping of those parts to an assembly factory
  • plus the cost of assembling and packaging the final product for sale
  • plus  the cost of shipping that product from the other side of the globe to Canada
  • plus the cost of maintaining a retail business outlet and employees in Canada where the item is sold at $1.00 for a profit.

(Canada post reposted a 31 million dollar loss in the second quarter of 2015)

Whether it be companies moving to Mexico, outsourcing to India, or the estimated 170 million child labor’s working long hours in appalling conditions for our designer clothes, how can we justify taking advantage of these people to put diamond collars on our dogs.

Dave Lister

listerlogic.com